← Search

Dave Jordan

Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 26W–35L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Dave Jordan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-09-12 · CHI E 18M3.5 1.Tam Bhat Sun 11 $25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Chad Anderson / Barry Dauber
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
Robert Vanhootegem / Michael Ballinger
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Hugo Salgado championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
MARK CUSHING / Hiren Patel
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Gene Fleischer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Joel Brown
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Lydon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · CDTA S 18&OM3.5 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 40&OM3.5 1.Tam Bhat Tue 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tarun Chawla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
50%
25W–25L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams