← Search

Ned Olney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peterborough, NH
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
31 matches · 24W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history31 matches
W
2026-08-02 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Gordon mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-03-24 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-02-11 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-01-14 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-06-10 · MITC:Harrington:Porowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-04-16 · MITC:Harrington:Porowski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-12 · MITC:PaunchyPoachers40+:Morison · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Taylor mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-19 · MITC:PaunchyPoachers40+:Morison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Morison mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-02-12 · MITC:PaunchyPoachers40+:Morison · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Morison mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-02-05 · A:MITC:Porowski:Harrington · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert