← Search

Amalia Stoica

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cleveland, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 156W–111L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history267 matches
W
2026-11-01 · C 5.5W CC Lammers · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lindsey Khabbaza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-30 · FD 6.0 CC Lombardo · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Meisenbach
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-10-23 · CX 6.5 MM Ghosh · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Giju Oommen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-10-18 · C 6.5W CC Stoica · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Greathouse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-16 · FD 6.0 CC Lombardo · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Tisha Bell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-10-09 · C 6.5W CC Stoica · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colleen Rice
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · C 6.5W CC Stoica · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridgette Palus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-20 · FD 6.0 CC Lombardo · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Florina Brown
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · CX 6.5 MM Ghosh · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Giju Oommen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · C 5.5W CC Lammers · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Renee Hehemann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tisha Bell championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Greathouse championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
3.0
72.9%
78W–29L · 59.5% of games
3.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 44% of games
5.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 52.9% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.7% of games
6.5
29.6%
8W–19L · 45.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 57.5% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
67 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams