← Search

A R

Brownsville, TX
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
4287 matches · 2013W–2274L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add A R to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history4,287 matches
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacques Klick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Wirth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Russell Robinson / Justin Henderson
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Calvin Hoovestol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Fults
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Bouchacourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kellie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Francis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2025-12-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellie Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level18 levels played
2.5
47.9%
68W–74L · 48.6% of games
3.0
39.2%
276W–428L · 45.2% of games
3.5
43%
430W–570L · 47.4% of games
4.0
51.7%
530W–496L · 50.4% of games
4.5
42.2%
140W–192L · 46.1% of games
5.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 61.6% of games
5.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.6% of games
6.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50% of games
6.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 46.1% of games
7.0
51.1%
70W–67L · 50.5% of games
7.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 49.9% of games
8.0
52.1%
76W–70L · 50.1% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.3% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games
6.0mixed
42.6%
26W–35L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
48.5%
163W–173L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
152W–95L · 51.5% of games
9.0mixed
36.7%
11W–19L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
1,247 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
1,138 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
1,094 matches
#1 Singles
10%
423 matches
#2 Singles
8%
342 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe