← Search

Sean Carmean

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 85W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-10-05 · AKing/ASimeon (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Alexander Aucoin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-30 · AKing/ASimeon (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Adam Tilly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · DThayaprasat (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Jessica Storm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · DThayaprasat (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Kindell Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · DThayaprasat (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Kindell Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-29 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Hager
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Default
2026-04-22 · QCarmean (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andy Misiaveg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-04-15 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Edward Fitzgibbons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-08 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Hager
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Quinn Carmean
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-18 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gerald Newburg
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-11 · QCarmean (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Hager
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
100%
16W–0L · 69.8% of games
5.0
82.5%
33W–7L · 65.8% of games
9.5
84%
21W–4L · 63.3% of games
10.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 71.4% of games
9.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#1 Singles
13%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova