← Search

Nicole Blount

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 46W–54L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history100 matches
W
Default
2026-10-13 · GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 18s) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Wagner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-28 · GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 40s) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cari Autry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-21 · GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 40s) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Wagner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-15 · GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 18s) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Carlyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-01 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Feng-Ling Wu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 3.5 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Atkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 3.5 MX) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · GCC - Spring Blount (3.5 18s W) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Carlson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · GCC-Blount/Pons (40s 3.5W SP) Love Wins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roberta Veluci-Marlow
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · GCC-Blount/Pons (40s 3.5W SP) Love Wins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Carlson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · GCC - Spring Blount (3.5 18s W) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Hopkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
Default
2026-05-01 · GCC-Blount/Pons (40s 3.5W SP) Love Wins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Perkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
41.2%
21W–30L · 44.6% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.6% of games
6.5
50%
17W–17L · 47.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova