← Search

Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 38W–25L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history63 matches
L
2026-10-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Valerie Epting
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Miwa Yoneyama
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-23 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW5.5A · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elena Bentchev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW5.5A · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tatiana Omolo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Soe
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jessica Soltz Rudd
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Burns
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Corbin
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jessica Soltz Rudd
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-05 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Soltz Rudd championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5B-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Courtney
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garvin Tom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.7% of games
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.2% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.1% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 57.6% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer