← Search

Leslie Foss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 42W–54L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history96 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Clifford-Hannah (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Cregger
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Clifford-Hannah (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Roth
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-27 · Hannah-Clifford (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Cregger
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-4
L
2026-04-15 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Hoffmann
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Alice Grady
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Boeker
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Meyer
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Miano
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · Hannah/Clifford (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Hoffmann
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Wojciechowski
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.8% of games
3.5
41.3%
38W–54L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
40 matches
#2 Singles
22%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova