← Search

Michael Houg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 16W–5L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history21 matches
L
2025-12-10 · Sterling Oaks / B. Marks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Foley
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-04 · Sterling Oaks / Seats · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nagy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-29 · Sterling Oaks / B. Marks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Stein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-28 · Sterling Oaks / Seats · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nagy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-14 · Sterling Oaks / Seats · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nagy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-02-26 · Sterling Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Bohan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-02-19 · Sterling Oaks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Marks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-02-05 · Sterling Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Marks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-01-31 · Sterling Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Cole
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-01-29 · Sterling Oaks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lance Finlinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-15 · Sterling Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Freedman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
W
2025-01-08 · Sterling Oaks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cal Damian
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 78.3% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Singles
19%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova