← Search

Janice Passarello

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 130W–110L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history240 matches
W
2026-10-27 · BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Szabo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-25 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Renee Cantu Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-23 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Hudson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-16 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Backus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-12 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjay Vadlamani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55MX7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-03 · BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kei Worry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abbe Braitman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-29 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lexi He
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zeljka Lemaster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-17 · BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Szabo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55MX7.0B · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.3% of games
3.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.4% of games
3.5
54.1%
46W–39L · 52.4% of games
5.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.9% of games
6.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.6% of games
7.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.3% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 42% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
50 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams