← Search

Keith Laterrade

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mandeville, LA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 78W–33L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Catt-40/6.5/M-Gennesis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay St. Romain
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Catt-40/6.5/M-Gennesis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Cuevas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · Doyle/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-PAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Dean
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Catt-40/6.5/M-Gennesis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Cuevas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · Doyle/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-PAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lane
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Dean championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Dean championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Krebs championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · Doyle/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-PAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Thompson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · Catt/Enk-40/3.5/M/Pelican · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lowell Shih championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Catt/Enk-40/3.5/M/Pelican · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Fournier championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Catt/Enk-40/3.5/M/Pelican · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Krebs championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
16W–4L · 59.7% of games
3.5
68%
17W–8L · 56.4% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.7% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 69.8% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.3% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova