← Search

Julie Weaver

— year-end
25 matches · 21W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Julie Weaver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-28 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Buhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Fenstermacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Buhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Furlong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Furlong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Stanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-18 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Stanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Stanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · Public Indoor Tennis Quach 9:00am · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Juffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 55.2% of games
6.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 67.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova