← Search

Amanda Bowersox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hanover, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 67W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history106 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Hanover Doubles or Nothing (Phillips) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Hess Phillips
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-19 · Hanover Doubles or Nothing (Phillips) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Hess Phillips
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · YACTA - BP (Bouselli) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Steele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · Hanover Doubles or Nothing (Phillips) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Siefken
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-05 · Hanover Doubles or Nothing (Phillips) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Cockey
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · YACTA - BP (Bouselli) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Steele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · Hanover Doubles or Nothing (Phillips) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Mooradian
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · Hanover Racquet Rebels - Phillips · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hockley
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Hanover Racquet Rebels - Phillips · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Greenholt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Hanover Racquet Rebels - Phillips · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Cockey
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Hanover Racquet Rebels - Phillips · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Cockey
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Hanover Racqueteers - Phillips · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Pomraning
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 54.1% of games
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 63.1% of games
3.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.2% of games
6.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 63.6% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer