← Search

Mark Hankins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Crystal Lake, IL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 29W–61L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history90 matches
L
2026-10-25 · CHI E 55M7.0 7.RT Peroussanov Sun 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alun Marsden
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-17 · NITA E 35M40c Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parker Turnipseed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · NITA E 35M40c Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 55M7.0 7.RT Peroussanov Sun 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Rubanovich
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Campagna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-3
W
Default
2026-07-28 · NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Torres mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stricker
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Williams
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hugo Salgado
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
Default
2026-06-13 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Venckus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
26.5%
18W–50L · 42% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 34.4% of games
6.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams