← Search

David Peng

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 79W–27L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history106 matches
W
2026-08-31 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · HV-King 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cori Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · HV-Clarke 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Brewer
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ned Staebler
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-0
W
2026-07-15 · RCAA-Diba (doubles clay) 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Muthig
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · RCAA-Diba (doubles clay) 18s 3.5M F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew van der Velde
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nolan Orfield
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · RCAA-Diba (doubles clay) 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Muthig
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · HV-Clarke 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lyn Loeffler
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ned Staebler
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-05 · HV-King 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cori Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 78.7% of games
3.5
77.6%
45W–13L · 63.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.2% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 52.1% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova