← Search

Briana Mullenax

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brentwood, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 122W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Burnstein/Stringfellow/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Akin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · Burnstein/Stringfellow/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Conyers
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · Conyers/Vogel/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Vogel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · Conyers/Vogel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Followill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burnstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · Conyers/Vogel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ali Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Ouellette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Conyers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Peyton
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Conyers
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Conyers
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-19 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Peyton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 73.4% of games
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.8% of games
3.5
81.5%
44W–10L · 62.4% of games
4.0
72.5%
29W–11L · 57.7% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.4% of games
6.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 65.9% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer