Search

Agnieszka Palarz

Beverly Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 191W–76L · seasons 20212026

Captains: add Agnieszka Palarz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history267 matches
W
2026-08-19 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick Mida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick Mida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick Mida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
Meera Lee / Sharon Barneschamps
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Amy Kanarios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Fleischer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Jennifer Godfrey / Mindy Gurnchamps
2026-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with Kimberly Strachan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-20 · FAC- Machus 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Julian Olejnik / Jocelyn Smithmixed
2026-07-10 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Giuseppe Turini
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · PINE-Raab (outside) 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 72.4% of games
2.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.6% of games
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 77.6% of games
3.5
87.9%
29W–4L · 67.9% of games
4.0
61.2%
30W–19L · 56.6% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
12W–0L · 70.6% of games
7.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.8% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.6% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 63.4% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 75.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 65.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.7% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert