Eric Abell
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
83 matches · 51W–32L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history83 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.9% of games
3.5
74.4%
29W–10L · 58.8% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 71.5% of games
8.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 39.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.