← Search

Amanda Riggs

— year-end
4 matches · 1W–3L · seasons 2021–2021

Captains: add Amanda Riggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history4 matches
L
2021-09-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Hatton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Kimberly Miller / Katie Crump
2021-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mia Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Rachel Crow / Amanda Owens
2021-08-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jocelyn Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 75% of the time
#2 Doubles
75%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova