Search

Dania Massry

Gig Harbor, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 25W–35L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.5
4 of 14
WA · 3.5
469 of 1209

Dania is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dania has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dania has gone from the 12th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.5
40%
20W–30L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
Caroline Thompson
2026-07-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.025better than expected — took 72% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Nicole Avendano
2026-05-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.082better than expected — took 92% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Nicole Avendano
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.001about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-2
W
2026-05-05 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Stevenson
2026-05-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Rachel Stevenson
2026-04-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.058below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Lauren Memmott / Nolan Edwardsmixed
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Silberman
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Kotnour
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.077better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.034better than expected — took 41% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.