← Search

Joe McDermott

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 84W–89L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M King - TCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Foster
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-22 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M King - TCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Bhardwaj
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M King - TCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Foster
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-05 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M King - TCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Cone
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-09 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M King - TCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Parrish
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katlin Mick mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Mixed 3.5X Sir and Madame Mix-a-Lots - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Oldfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Mixed 3.5X Sir and Madame Mix-a-Lots - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Heywood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · Mixed 3.5X Sir and Madame Mix-a-Lots - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Burton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · Mixed 3.5X Sir and Madame Mix-a-Lots - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kari Donohue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Mixed 3.5X Sir and Madame Mix-a-Lots - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Oldfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · 40 & Over 3.5X McDermott - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Heywood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 55.2% of games
3.5
53.3%
24W–21L · 51.1% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 35.9% of games
3.5mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer