← Search

Kristine Carney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chappaqua, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 57W–30L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history87 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Chestnut Ridge: Hit Squad - 6.0 Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Surinder Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-21 · Chestnut Ridge Wise Aces 3.0 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Brant
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-10-14 · Chestnut Ridge Wise Aces 3.0 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marissa Levey
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · Chestnut Ridge: Hit Squad - 6.0 Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with PJ O'Mara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-11 · Chestnut Ridge: Servive the Day (Fall) - 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rackoff
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Arnoldt championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sari Bourne championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sari Bourne championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sari Bourne championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sari Bourne championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Southern:Chestnut Ridge Smash Hits 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sari Bourne championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Shapiro championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 58% of games
3.0
68.3%
41W–19L · 60.2% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#1 Singles
24%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe