← Search

Dana Hibner

Camarillo, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 81W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dana Hibner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Spanish Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soraya Hostetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · Spanish Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Germann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · Spanish Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandhya Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · Spanish Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Spanish Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Czubiak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Heitman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Kimball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 57.3% of games
3.5
52.3%
56W–51L · 51.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.6% of games
0.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova