← Search

MEG SPEARS

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Simons Island, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 66W–44L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-04 · CCGA/Casey Igel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Kennerly
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #3 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Peter Boven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #3 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Ryan Ennis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-1
W
2026-06-28 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #3 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Peter Boven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rudy Celis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Dunham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Luppino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommie Holloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-16 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommie Holloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · CCGA/Casey Igel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Suddath
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-17 · CCGA/Casey Igel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Bisesi
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-14 · CCGA/Casey Igel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Suddath
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.2% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76.7%
33W–10L · 59.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.4% of games
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 60.1% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.9% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova