← Search

Karen Zuzek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gloversville, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 33W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2025-11-23 · Elm Park Grinders 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Enrique Girard mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-02 · Elm Park Grinders 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chien-fu Huang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Elm Park Grinders 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hagen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · Elm Park Grinders 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Shores mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · Elm Park Grinders 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yi Zhang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-08-22 · Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Glasser
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-16 · Wise Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzannah Dormond
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-06-27 · Lovin Tennis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lott
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-06-20 · Lovin Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Glasser
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-13 · Lovin Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Denney
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-16 · Lovin Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paddi McGrinder
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-15 · Schlottner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Pageau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 47.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
46.9%
15W–17L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer