← Search

Sandra Gilbert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evergreen, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 4W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-07-23 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Naranjo
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Naranjo
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Naranjo
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-05 · MC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hagar
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-3
L
2026-06-11 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Bent
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jayne McGarry
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-14 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frances Swartwout
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-12 · MC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Coria
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-05 · MC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kat Holm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-29 · MC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Coria
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-08 · MC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hagar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-01 · MC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hagar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
9.7%
3W–28L · 27% of games
6.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 23% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer