← Search

Brady Koesel

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 48W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brady Koesel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-07-21 · MHall (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Evan Anderson
2026-07-14 · MHall (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · MHall (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · MHall (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · MHall (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-07 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-24 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · JLewis (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Fiddes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-07 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-10-06 · JLewis (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Fiddes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-30 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vikram Datta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 57.4% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 38.8% of games
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.6% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#1 Singles
24%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer