← Search

Jonathan Phan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Diamond Bar, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 69W–59L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-10-31 · SGV Underdogs-Bandaru-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chun Li
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Luzzi
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · SGV Underdogs-Bandaru-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Lee
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Lee
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · SGV Underdogs-Bandaru-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Liz Kirksey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald Alphonse
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 52.5% of games
3.5
49.4%
43W–44L · 49.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#2 Singles
16%
21 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe