← Search

Jamie Sugar-Butter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rockport, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-08-30 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Davies championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Brady championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Chace championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten DeSalvo
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Hall
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Brady
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · BRTC:Bass River Baddies:Chace/Sugar-Butter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Chace
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-07 · BRTC:Backhanded Compliment:Bloom/Sones · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Hall championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-08-23 · BRTC:Backhanded Compliment:Bloom/Sones · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katharine Perry championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-30 · BRTC:Backhanded Compliment:Bloom/Sones · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Chace
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-23 · BRTC:Backhanded Compliment:Bloom/Sones · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Riehl
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-08 · MAC:Manchester Green:Koch/Sones · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicola Bradley
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 74% of games
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.8% of games
4.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#2 Singles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams