Search

David Ferris

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 16W–9L · seasons 20262026

Captains: add David Ferris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Jo.Diamond55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · Jo.Diamond55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · Mi.Elstob55S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-3
L
2026-07-15 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · Mi.Elstob55S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-03 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-01 · Mi.Elstob55S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Heaphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Daniel Murphy / Scott McElreath
2026-04-30 · Jo.Diamond55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Krause
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Da.Swann55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANDY PASSMAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Da.Swann55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Zargo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.8% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova