← Search

Sydney Breaker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 78W–86L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history164 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Stevens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-05 · Reding/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Reding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mitsy Tharp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-01 · Reding/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Doose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-01 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Thalheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-23 · Reding/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hicks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-15 · Reding/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsy Dawson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Sisco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Stevens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Sisco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Reding/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Telford
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-5
W
2026-08-13 · Jones/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Bracey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
72%
18W–7L · 56.8% of games
3.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 47.8% of games
3.5
38.8%
19W–30L · 44.5% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 33% of games
5.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 66% of games
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 43.6% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.3% of games
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.1% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
13%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
13 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams