← Search

Zoe Robertson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Kisco, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 41W–53L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history94 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-06 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Torres
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-01 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Torres
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Whippoorwill Whippin’ Aces 18+ 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Whippoorwill Whippin’ Aces 18+ 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · W/R: CRRC: Mixed Smashers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-27 · Whippoorwill Whippin’ Aces 18+ 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · W/R: CRRC: Mixed Smashers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-17 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Schulman
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-11 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Schulman
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-03 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
42.9%
39W–52L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams