← Search

Tai Kam

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 40W–65L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tai Kam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-03 · PKartes/WDawson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-17 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · PKartes/WDawson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Henry Ko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sam Skaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · WDawson (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-22 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
55.1%
27W–22L · 54.4% of games
4.0
4%
1W–24L · 30.3% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 41.7% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova