← Search

William Boyette

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 118W–38L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history156 matches
L
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard McClenny championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lawrence Brock championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard McClenny championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Cockayne championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · La.Brock18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Ma.Treires18C · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with J Wilbur Dotson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-4
W
2026-09-27 · La.Brock18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Newsome championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Newsome championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Newsome championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · La.Brock18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-30 · La.Brock18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
78.9%
56W–15L · 59.3% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 65.3% of games
9.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 53.1% of games
4.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.2% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.3% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert