← Search

Jane Sison

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Mateo, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 76W–101L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history177 matches
W
2026-11-01 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dennis Louie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-28 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mariko Kimura
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Fuerst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-16 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lorraine Choi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rodney Prezeau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dennis Louie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-05 · SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosa Lopez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phil Medina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kumar Iyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Kane
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Kane
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
Default
2026-05-24 · MILLBRAE RC 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol High
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
3.0
44.1%
30W–38L · 46.9% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.4% of games
5.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 56% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 51.5% of games
6.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 43.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.8%
14W–23L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
26 matches
#1 Singles
10%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams