← Search

Stacy Crowe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 52W–38L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history90 matches
L
2026-10-24 · MCTC/Crowe/Addison 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · MCTC/Crowe/Addison 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 4-6
W
2026-09-12 · MCTC/Crowe/Addison 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · COTA/Amberlee Aboormar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Barton championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · COTA/Amberlee Aboormar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Price championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · OVP/Aboomar/Vadeboncoeur · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Rittenhouse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-21 · OVP/Crowe/6.5 Sunday Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Duvall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Crowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · COTA/Amberlee Aboormar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Barton
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aning Melton championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Chapman championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · #2 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.5% of games
3.0
58.3%
21W–15L · 55.9% of games
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 51.7% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 67% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert