← Search

Leslie Sistla

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 2W–12L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Bonita Bay / Spears · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Keenan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · Singles · 3.5 tourney
loading the estimate
0-4, 0-4
L
2026-10-10 · Singles · 3.5 tourney
loading the estimate
0-4, 1-4
L
2022-12-08 · Treviso Bay - K. Barger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louise Decker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-12-01 · Treviso Bay - K. Barger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Seal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2022-11-17 · Treviso Bay - K. Barger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Miles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
L
2022-11-14 · Treviso Bay - K. Barger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Seal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2022-03-10 · Treviso Bay - Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-02-10 · Treviso Bay - Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louise Decker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-02-03 · Treviso Bay - Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louise Decker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2022-01-27 · Treviso Bay - Hamilton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Carone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-01-13 · Treviso Bay - Hamilton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marybeth Broderick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches
Singles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer