← Search

Marisa Cahill

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 122W–43L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history165 matches
L
2026-06-17 · Cortright/Bryant/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Derrick Wilson mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-04-22 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Kamphausen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-04-14 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Olivia Gaston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Mitchell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-03 · Manasco/Cahill · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madeline Donahue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kirsten Fredrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-08-26 · Manasco/Cahill · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-18 · Manasco/Cahill · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pauline Godoy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-14 · Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bailey
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-30 · Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bailey
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-27 · Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Nunez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level18 levels played
2.25
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 90.9% of games
2.75
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.1% of games
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.2% of games
3.5
63%
17W–10L · 56.8% of games
4.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 59% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.2% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.9% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 52.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 66.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal