Search

Cliff Kao

Monmouth Junction, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 20242026

Captains: add Cliff Kao to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-05-17 · CJT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · CJT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Worry About Crushing · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-19 · CJT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daren Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · Worry About Crushing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · Worry About Crushing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-29 · CJT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-22 · Worry About Crushing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · Worry About Crushing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-01 · CJT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Slawinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-27 · Worry About Crushing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Ardiente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 43.5% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.8% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova