← Search

Susan Gillis

— year-end
75 matches · 36W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Susan Gillis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-01 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Coggin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jessica Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Monesmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan de la O
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-23 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesa Monte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Monesmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olga Spittle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olga Spittle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-28 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olga Spittle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-22 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jess Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams50 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 52.9% of games
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 40.1% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert