← Search

Tiana Rick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Andover, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 19W–25L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history44 matches
L
2026-07-20 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Luongo
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Tomes
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Luongo
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
Default
2026-07-09 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noelle Statires
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Luongo
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Tomes
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Luongo
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noelle Statires
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Tomes
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Murphy
loading the estimate
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Doran-Serafino
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.8% of games
3.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 45% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams