Mike Ericson
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
62 matches · 33W–29L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history62 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
6.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 64.3% of games
7.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 45.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.