← Search

Dana Wagoner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 177W–44L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Ketchum mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Ketchum mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Ketchum mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-22 · Naples Bay Resort / Dana · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-19 · Naples Bay Resort / Dana · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nannette Staropoli
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-17 · Monterey / Wagoner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Schuenke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · COLLIER/Marchand · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Ketchum mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-25 · COLLIER/Marchand · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Ketchum mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nannette Staropoli championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nannette Staropoli championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nannette Staropoli championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
4.0
94.1%
48W–3L · 71.9% of games
4.5
73.9%
82W–29L · 58.5% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
91.3%
21W–2L · 65.6% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
90 matches
#1 Singles
28%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King