← Search

Hunter Holcomb

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Purvis, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 70W–22L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Christ championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.7% of games
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.6% of games
4.0
95.2%
20W–1L · 72.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 52.8% of games
6.5
100%
9W–0L · 72.2% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.7% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Singles
11%
10 matches
Singles
8%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer