← Search

Joanie Mankus

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Englewood, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history60 matches
L
2026-06-11 · VC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trisha Barney
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · VC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Nisbet
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · VC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annie Cordova
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · VC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Nisbet
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-12 · VC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hoskins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-05 · VC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trisha Barney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-29 · VC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Fridstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-22 · VC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Nisbet
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-08 · VC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Chichester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-07 · VC PINK · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Likovich
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-07-31 · VC PINK · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Molly Weaver
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-07-10 · VC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nancy Fridstein
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
60%
27W–18L · 54.7% of games
6.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe