← Search

Merrill Strange

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gordonsville, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 18W–20L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history38 matches
L
2025-11-04 · Merrick - Keswick · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Bouton
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-21 · Merrick - Keswick · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amelia Black
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-14 · Merrick - Keswick · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Perdue
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-20 · Keswick-Merrick · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Black
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-30 · Keswick-Merrick · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cailin Collier
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-14 · Keswick-Merrick · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Merrick
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-11-05 · Keswick-Merrick · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Silvester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-10-29 · Keswick-Merrick · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Silvester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-23 · Keswick-Merrick · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cailin Collier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-10-11 · Keswick-Merrick · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Silvester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-05 · Keswick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cabell Mains
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-31 · Keswick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anais Gupton
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.3% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.4% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer