← Search

Natalie Richardson

— year-end
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Natalie Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-08-24 · BTA-C GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Howlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Sisneros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Sisneros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Sisneros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-17 · LAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Upthegrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-10 · LAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Staton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-06-03 · LAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kirtland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-09-07 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqueline Wierzba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-08-24 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joni Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-08-17 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth LaBelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-08-04 · NJ RED · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
26.7%
8W–22L · 38.2% of games
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Singles
18%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert