← Search

Rachel Boisvert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 97W–23L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-04-28 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Walker
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-03 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Walker
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Marissa Kleber / Mallory Miller
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
Monica Carlson / Catherine Land
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-22 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-14 · von Allmen/Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Oksana Lackey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-08 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-01 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerri Oakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
Megan Reid / Lydia Sanders
2025-09-23 · von Allmen/Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Oksana Lackey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-09-10 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-03 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Moose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 77.3% of games
3.0
93.3%
28W–2L · 75.3% of games
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 63.2% of games
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.3% of games
5.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.9% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 84% of games
6.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 66% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
52 matches
#1 Singles
18%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer