← Search

Alina Lisanke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belmont, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 42W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history64 matches
W
2026-10-23 · WTC:Fiery Duos:Mangaser/Lisanke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francis Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · WTC:Fiery Duos:Mangaser/Lisanke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ganesh Rajaraman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-5
W
2026-09-18 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Boris Shepov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-4
W
2026-07-15 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Fallon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
Default
2026-07-14 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Weina Randel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Rumley
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Sanatar
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-06-18 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Rumley
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Olken
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Weina Randel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 57.5% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert