← Search

Katherine Boehm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 107W–36L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history143 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Indy C 6.5W WIRC Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abby Dennis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-5
L
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with SC Bocade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-24 · Indy C 6.5W WIRC Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elyse Handel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Avery Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · Indy C 6.5W WIRC Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caitlin Byczko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · Indy CX 6.5 MTC Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Ficklin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Batuello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trent Miller mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Indy X18 7.0X IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Bantz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Delp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Delp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Moore · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 59.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 46.8% of games
5.5
75%
12W–4L · 55.9% of games
6.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 61.9% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 63.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert